<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Analysis or Insight &#8211; Just Negative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jakeldaily.com/no-analysis-or-insight-just-negative-wanker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jakeldaily.com/no-analysis-or-insight-just-negative-wanker/</link>
	<description>Jason &#38; Kelly&#039;s Daily Gossip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:14:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 50 Ways Get Traffic to Your Blog &#187; Ja Kel Daily Dot Com &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.jakeldaily.com/no-analysis-or-insight-just-negative-wanker/comment-page-1/#comment-8244</link>
		<dc:creator>50 Ways Get Traffic to Your Blog &#187; Ja Kel Daily Dot Com &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jakeldaily.com/?p=49#comment-8244</guid>
		<description>[...] 27.Â Stand up for yourself &amp; your site [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 27.Â Stand up for yourself &amp; your site [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life is Colourful</title>
		<link>http://www.jakeldaily.com/no-analysis-or-insight-just-negative-wanker/comment-page-1/#comment-7503</link>
		<dc:creator>Life is Colourful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jakeldaily.com/?p=49#comment-7503</guid>
		<description>I think I am pretty late to even dig out whatever happened between you guys. I tried to check out what exactly was the first review by Kevan, but could not find the brand new second one as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I am pretty late to even dig out whatever happened between you guys. I tried to check out what exactly was the first review by Kevan, but could not find the brand new second one as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Mooney</title>
		<link>http://www.jakeldaily.com/no-analysis-or-insight-just-negative-wanker/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Mooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jakeldaily.com/?p=49#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Good thing you guys are at peace now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thing you guys are at peace now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevan</title>
		<link>http://www.jakeldaily.com/no-analysis-or-insight-just-negative-wanker/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jakeldaily.com/?p=49#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks Jason. Too bad I still get the &quot;cocky&quot; label, but you win some, you lose some, right? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks Jason. Too bad I still get the &#8220;cocky&#8221; label, but you win some, you lose some, right? <img src='http://www.jakeldaily.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Neuman</title>
		<link>http://www.jakeldaily.com/no-analysis-or-insight-just-negative-wanker/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Neuman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jakeldaily.com/?p=49#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Review and apology accepted.  I have also updated my review on batch 1 and opinion of you.  I am almost certain however that you are still cocky but that&#039;s ok in my book. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Review and apology accepted.  I have also updated my review on batch 1 and opinion of you.  I am almost certain however that you are still cocky but that&#8217;s ok in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevan</title>
		<link>http://www.jakeldaily.com/no-analysis-or-insight-just-negative-wanker/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jakeldaily.com/?p=49#comment-69</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, and I totally understand. I&#039;ve replaced my original review with a brand new one. Please have a look at it and let me know if it&#039;s adequately constructive:
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, and I totally understand. I&#8217;ve replaced my original review with a brand new one. Please have a look at it and let me know if it&#8217;s adequately constructive:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Neuman</title>
		<link>http://www.jakeldaily.com/no-analysis-or-insight-just-negative-wanker/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Neuman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jakeldaily.com/?p=49#comment-66</guid>
		<description>It was not a matter of being offended and the review being negative.  I do not mind negative reviews but at least when being negative there could have been some type of constructive criticism behind, basically how you would make things better.  You can leave your review as is if you like and maybe ad some constructive criticism on what you would fix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was not a matter of being offended and the review being negative.  I do not mind negative reviews but at least when being negative there could have been some type of constructive criticism behind, basically how you would make things better.  You can leave your review as is if you like and maybe ad some constructive criticism on what you would fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

